Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8919
TitleAlexander v Seton Hall University
Date2010-09-13 12:19:00
DescriptionDid the employers act of payment constitute continuing discrimination for purposes of determining whether plaintiffs complaint alleging sex and age discrimination in pay was timely filed?
Appealhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a1251-08.opn.html
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-87-09.opn.html
Doc IDA-87-09
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Patricia F. BreuningerAppellant
Rosemary S. GousmanRespondent