Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 8996 |
| Title | State v. Larry Henderson |
| Date | 2011-03-28 10:03:00 |
| Description | Did the participation of the investigating officer in this eyewitness's identification of defendant in a photographic array require a presumption that the identification was impermissibly suggestive? |
| Appeal | http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a4193-04.opn.html |
| Opinion | http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-8-08.opn.html |
| Doc ID | A-8-08part2 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Deborah C. Bartolomey | Appellant |
| Joseph E. Krakora | Respondent |