Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 8765 |
| Title | State v. Larry R. Henderson |
| Date | 2009-01-20 10:19:00 |
| Description | Did the participation of the investigating officer in this eyewitnesss identification of defendant in a photographic array require a presumption that the identification was impermissibly suggestive? |
| Appeal | http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a2921-04.opn.html |
| Opinion | http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-8-08.doc.html |
| Doc ID | A-8-08 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Deborah C. Bartolomey | Appellant |
| Larry R. Henderson | Respondent |
| Joseph E. Krakora | Respondent |