Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8614
TitleState v. Michael Taffaro
Date2008-02-19 10:28:00
DescriptionDid the trial courts extensive questioning of defendant and the prosecutors crossexamination about statements defendant did not make to his attorney constitute plain error?
Appealhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a5419-04.opn.html
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-8-07.doc.html
Doc IDA-8-07
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Robert A. SeelenfreundAppellant
Catherine A. FoddaiRespondent