Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8800
TitleRobertet Flavors, Inc. v. Tami-Githens, Inc.
Date2009-09-15 10:00:00
DescriptionWas it appropriate to bar plaintiff from presenting any expert testimony because of plaintiffs spoliation of evidence replacement of allegedly defective windows?
Appealhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a2381-06.opn.html
Opinion
Doc IDA-70-71-08
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Marc ShortinoAppellant
Patrick T. CollinsRespondent