Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8660
TitleSroczynski v. Milek
Date2008-05-05 12:44:00
DescriptionWas the cancellation of this workers compensation insurance policy by the compensation carrier ineffective because of the carriers failure to include in the notice sent to the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance a certified statement that the notice was served on the employer as required by NJSA 34 15 81b?
Appealhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a3103-06.opn.html
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-68-07.doc.html
Doc IDA-68-77-07
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Michael J. MaroneAppellant
David HoffmanRespondent
William L. BoyanRespondent
Donna Marie MontanoRespondent