Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID | 10027 |
Title | STATE v. WILLIAM BURKERT |
Date | 2017-09-11 03:01:03 |
Description | Was defendant's conduct distributing wedding photographs of a colleague to which defendant had added vulgar annotations protected speech that could not constitute criminal harassment? |
Appeal | |
Opinion | |
Doc ID | A-6-16 |
Metadata | Dublin Core |
Video Feed |
Counsel | Type |
---|---|
Sarah Licter | Appellant |
Steven J. Kaflowitz | Respondent |