Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID10027
TitleSTATE v. WILLIAM BURKERT
Date2017-09-11 03:01:03
DescriptionWas defendant's conduct distributing wedding photographs of a colleague to which defendant had added vulgar annotations protected speech that could not constitute criminal harassment?
Appeal
Opinion
Doc IDA-6-16
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Sarah LicterAppellant
Steven J. KaflowitzRespondent