Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 10106 |
| Title | STATE V DORIAN PRESSLEY a/k/a JUSTIN BELTON |
| Date | 2018-01-30 11:00:07 |
| Description | Was the undercover officer’s identification of defendant impermissibly suggestive, such that defendant was entitled to a Wade hearing, where the officer identified defendant from a single photograph within one hour of the undercover transaction? |
| Appeal | |
| Opinion | |
| Doc ID | A-52-16 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Frank J. Pugliese | Appellant |
| Stephanie Davis Elson | Respondent |