Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 9454 |
| Title | State v. R.K. |
| Date | 2014-10-07 13:15:59 |
| Description | Was defendant entitled to a new trial because the fresh-complaint testimony was excessively detailed and cumulative and admitted without a limiting instruction, as well as other errors Chief Justice and Associates, Judge Cuff |
| Appeal | |
| Opinion | |
| Doc ID | A-39-13 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Appellant | |
| Frank M. Gennaro | Appellant |
| Richard E. McKelvey | Respondent |