Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8356
TitleMuhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach
Date2006-02-14 11:53:00
DescriptionAre the provisions in these payday loan contracts requiring arbitration of all claims and barring participation in class actions unconscionable and therefore unenforceable?
Appealhttp://165.230.71.5/supct/opinions/muhammadv.pdf
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-39-05.doc.html
Doc IDA-39-05
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Michael J. QuickAppellant
David G. McMillanAppellant
Jeffrey C. BursteinAppellant
Marc J. ZuckerRespondent
Claudia T. CallawayRespondent
David M. GossettRespondent