Go Back to Browsing Options
| Argument ID | 8611 |
| Title | State v. Richard Berezansky |
| Date | 2008-02-05 12:18:00 |
| Description | Does the double jeopardy clause bar a retrial when defendant conviction of driving under the influence is vacated because the State failed to present sufficient evidence of the chain of custody of defendant blood sample? |
| Appeal | http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a4283-04.opn.html |
| Opinion | |
| Doc ID | A-3-07 |
| Metadata | Dublin Core |
| Video Feed |
| Counsel | Type |
|---|---|
| Stanly F. Rizzolo | Appellant |
| Leslie A. Stolbof Sinemus | Appellant |
| James L. McConnell | Respondent |
| Daniel I. Bornstein | Respondent |