Go Back to Browsing Options
Argument ID8308
TitleFitzgerald v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.
Date2005-10-25 11:11:00
DescriptionIn this complaint alleging sexual harassment under the Law Against Discrimination, did the trial court err in prohibiting the defense from calling an expert originally designated by plaintiff as one of her experts, and in excluding the testimony offered by defendants about plaintiff's character for untruthfulness?
Appealhttp://165.230.71.5/supct/opinions/fitzgeraldvsrob.pdf
Opinionhttp://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/supreme/a-120-04.opn.html
Doc IDA-120-04
MetadataDublin Core
Video Feed


Counsel Type
Carl A. SalisburyAppellant
Maureen S. BinettiRespondent