Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="9973" >
< dc:title >STATE V. RODNEY J. MILES< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2017-01-04 01:51:16< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-72-15< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >Does the �same evidence� test, as expressed by the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410 (1980), continue to govern the double jeopardy analysis in New Jersey for defendants facing successive prosecutions?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Joseph A. Glyn< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Brian P. Keenan< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >
< rdf:Description rdf:about="9973" >
< dc:title >STATE V. RODNEY J. MILES< /dc:title >
< dc:date >2017-01-04 01:51:16< /dc:date >
< dc:format >< /dc:format >
< dc:language > en< /dc:language >
< dc:identifier >A-72-15< /dc:identifier >
< dc:description >Does the �same evidence� test, as expressed by the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410 (1980), continue to govern the double jeopardy analysis in New Jersey for defendants facing successive prosecutions?< /dc:description >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >
< dc:contributer >Joseph A. Glyn< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >
< dc:contributer >Brian P. Keenan< /dc:contributer >
< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >
< /rdf:Description >
< /rdf:RDF >