Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >< rdf:Description rdf:about="9679" >< dc:title >STATE V. FELICIANO< /dc:title >< dc:date >2015-12-02 01:16:05< /dc:date >< dc:format >< /dc:format >< dc:language > en< /dc:language >< dc:identifier >A-24-14< /dc:identifier >< dc:description >Does the roving warrant provision of the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-9(g), which allows the police to wiretap telephones not identified in the warrant application on a showing that the target has purposefully attempted to thwart interception by changing telephones, violate the particularity requirements of the New Jersey and federal constitutions? < /dc:description >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >< dc:contributer >Elizabeth C. Jarit< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Steven A. Yomtov< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< /rdf:Description >< /rdf:RDF >