Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >< rdf:Description rdf:about="9637" >< dc:title >STATE V. HOWARD JONES< /dc:title >< dc:date >2015-09-16 01:17:00< /dc:date >< dc:format >< /dc:format >< dc:language > en< /dc:language >< dc:identifier >A-112-13< /dc:identifier >< dc:description > In this case involving a show-up identification shortly after the defendant allegedly exposed himself to the victim, did the Appellate Division properly apply the factors established in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed. 2d 140 (1977), to conclude that the victim’s identification was not impermissibly suggestive?< /dc:description >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >< dc:contributer >Stephen P. Hunter< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Deborah C. Bartolomey< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Mfor T. Gary Mitchell< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< /rdf:Description >< /rdf:RDF >