Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >< rdf:Description rdf:about="9636" >< dc:title >STATE V. R.P.< /dc:title >< dc:date >2015-09-16 12:12:02< /dc:date >< dc:format >< /dc:format >< dc:language > en< /dc:language >< dc:identifier >A-108-13< /dc:identifier >< dc:description > Having determined that defendant’s conviction for first-degree aggravated sexual assault had to be vacated, was the Appellate Division required to mold the verdict to second-degree sexual assault under the circumstances presented?< /dc:description >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >< dc:contributer >Paul H. Heinzel< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Al Glimis< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Mfor T. Gary Mitchell< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< /rdf:Description >< /rdf:RDF >