Go Back to Browsing Options
< rdf:RDF >< rdf:Description rdf:about="10103" >< dc:title >STATE V. JAMES E. JONES & LIKISHA JONES< /dc:title >< dc:date >2018-01-29 10:00:42< /dc:date >< dc:format >< /dc:format >< dc:language > en< /dc:language >< dc:identifier >A-63/64/65-16< /dc:identifier >< dc:description >Did the DNA exception to the statute of limitations apply (N.J.S.A. 2C:1-6(c)), such that the five-year limitations period did not bar defendants’ prosecution (see also State v. Gary Twiggs, A-51-16); and, did defendants’ conduct over ten years make the conspiracy a continuing offense, such that the statute of limitations was not a bar to prosecution?< /dc:description >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label=" justice " >< dc:contributer >Sarah Lichter< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="0" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Daniel V. Gautieri< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< dc:contributer >Christopher T. Campbell< /dc:contributer >< rdfs:Class rdfs:label="1" >< /rdfs:Class >< /rdf:Description >< /rdf:RDF >